Call me an extremist, but I think there should be a law against cutting down trees. And not just because the sound of chain saws and tree removal trucks drive me crazy (I hate them), but because we need to value and respect the impact that trees have on the world.
As we struggle to get a grip on climate change and our human impact on the environment, trees standout as the easiest, cheapest and most aesthetically pleasing tool we have. They suck carbon out of the air, store it within themselves, and pump out oxygen. They provide shade, habitat for birds and other animals, and make the whole community look better.
I don’t have patience for people who have trees removed unless there’s an excellent reason.
If a tree exists on a property before you purchase it, I believe that tree should be legally protected against removal and the whim of the property owner. If you fear the risk of the backyard tree falling on your house, your option is to not buy that house.
If you don’t like the dirt, mess and leaves some trees bring, you have the right to not purchase that property.
If you want sun on your property, don’t buy a house under the trees.
If you plant a tree on your property but then decide there’s a problem with it, the tree should be protected if it has grown to a certain size.
I know this may seem extreme, and I know there are many nuanced situations in which it might be good to remove a tree. That’s why there would need to be some sort of municipal board that would be tasked with approving the removal of them.
This could work very similar to the way zoning boards work. In most municipalities, you can’t just do whatever you want to your house, you have to apply to the zoning board to make sure you are compliant with the local zoning ordinance. I think trees should have their own ordinance, spelling out under which conditions trees can be removed or significantly altered. Many cities and towns across the country already have tree laws in place, but at least in my area, they seem to be nowhere near strict enough.
If a stream runs through your property, it’s illegal to destroy its water quality just because it exists on your land. The water in that stream is an important community resource. I believe trees should be viewed the same way.
We need to recognize and embrace the importance of trees, and create laws that reflect their value.
For more RebEarth articles and a variety of other stories, visit Todd’s Five O’Clock Shadow blog. Todd is also a staff writer at Wise & Shine Magazine. For Todd’s musical activities and new releases visit www.toddfulginiti.com.

Oh my goodness, yes! Agree, agree. Trees are precious and it pains us when we see trees – even when they’re diseased – coming down. Choosing to remove them because of any inconvenience hurts my heart. 😢
LikeLiked by 1 person
💯
LikeLike
That’s a horrible thing to say to a printer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make paper from hemp!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hemp = 👑
LikeLike
😂😂 Point taken Mike!
LikeLike
Mmmm🤷♀️
LikeLike
Mmm🤷♀️
Sent from my iPhone
<
div dir=”ltr”>
<
blockquote type=”cite”>
LikeLike
I am also extremist Todd, as I agree totally with your post. Some years ago, a neighbor cut down a tree because of the leaves falling on his car. I was interviewed by a local TV that asked for my opinion. There is only one way you can define trees. They are our friends, they do only good to us, to the environment, not to speak about their beauty. In Estonia they would call for a referendum to decide whether putting down a tree. We all should vote to let trees live unless they were ill and constitute a danger for other trees. A friend of mine wanted to form a political party to protect trees, as he thinks that the Green Party doesn’t do much to fight real estate businesses, that in Brussels are the biggest threat to trees.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting Cristiana. I like that Estonian idea! Interesting to hear about Brussels and the Green Party- the Greens are not very strong here in the US and I’m not sure whether their platform is actually “green” or not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What an eye-opening piece that encourages us to think of ourselves as guardians of the trees instead of owners of the land. I think Seattle has some pretty solid tree laws. My house sits on a lot with the original plum trees and lilac trees from 100 years ago. Amazing that we have those in the city. Thank you for making me appreciate them, Todd!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for reading Wynne! Sounds like you have a pretty cool lot 😎🌲 Happy Thanksgiving!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tara and I go back and forth constantly about the trees on our property. I love every single one of them, but she wants more room for gardening. We actually just booked a tree service to remove four of them, but only because they are dead or dying. Even taking them out pains me a little, but I remind myself I wouldn’t keep a brain-dead family member hooked up to a machine to prolong their life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good point- thanks for reading & commenting Mark!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mee too I agree and I think trees are very important for our human life and for our planet.. SoI say to all people to plant trees even in their gardens. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting FQ! 🌳
LikeLike